Abstract
Our capstone team designed and fabricated a steel bridge to compete in the 2025 ASCE
Student Steel Bridge Competition. The bridge was designed to fit dimensional requirements
outlined in the competition rules and to model improvements for the Skunk River Trail. The
team optimized structural performance, constructability, and aesthetics through iterative
modeling and analysis in Revit and RAM Elements. The Revit drawings include plans, sections,
a 3D rendered view, and a detail sheet for bolted connections. The analytical model in RAM
Elements is used for finding the weight, displacement, and member stresses. The primary goal
was to create the lightest bridge possible that is easy to construct and has minimal vertical and
lateral displacement during the load test. After completing the model, steel was ordered, and the
bridge was fabricated by the team. The fabrication process included welding, cutting, bolt-hole
drilling, grinding, and painting. The bridge was tested under an oscillating 2500lb load in the
UVA structures laboratory. Alongside technical objectives, the team prioritized reviving the
UVA Steel Bridge Team by recruiting underclassmen, structuring leadership roles, and holding
workshops. The report includes detailed drawings, design evolution, and compliance
documentation with AISC and ASCE competition standards. Our team was successful in
constructing the bridge and competing in the ASCE Regional Symposium at the end of March
2025. Although the bridge was disqualified due to slightly exceeding the 45-minute construction
time limit, the bridge performed well under load tests, and the competition provided valuable
insights for future years. Future teams will look to build a lighter bridge with fewer connections
and smaller members. Our team satisfied its goals of constructing the bridge, attending the
competition, and building a strong foundation of the UVA Steel Bridge Club for the future.
My STS research paper focuses on mass timber, a possible alternative material to
structural steel. We were required to use steel for the design competition, but perhaps a different
material would have performed just as well while minimizing harm to the environment. Efforts have been made to make steel a more sustainable material, but it still has a substantial carbon
footprint. Mass timber is made from layering and gluing together lumber boards at an angled
pattern. These built-up members have a comparable bearing capacity to steel beams but are
lighter and emit less carbon dioxide during the manufacturing process. Wood’s ability to
sequester carbon also contributes to the lower net carbon emissions. This new structural material
was first introduced in Europe in the 1990s and has since gained popularity due to the efficiency
of fabrication, delivery, & construction, the reduction of construction noise, the aesthetics of
exposed wood, and the environmental benefits. Various types of mass timber have also recently
been published in product standards and building design codes. My research lists various
advocacy groups, trade associations, and lobbying groups that have either aided or hindered the
adaptation of mass timber in new construction. Some environmental groups that support mass
timber development include the Natural Resource Defense Council and American Forests. A few
companies currently investing in mass timber development include the International Association
for Mass Timber Construction, Mass Timber Strategy, Boston Mass Timber Accelerator,
Woodworks, and the American Wood Council. On the other hand, the American Institute of
Steel Construction and the American Iron and Steel Institute are working to promote steel as the
most sustainable choice since it is technically a recyclable material. This competition will likely
delay widespread adaptation of mass timber as a primary structural material. My research
outlines necessary steps to overcome the reluctance to transition from steel to mass timber in the
construction industry.
